Received: from nova.unix.portal.com by mail.netcom.com (8.6.12/Netcom)
id AAA02257; Fri, 28 Apr 1995 00:24:58 -0700
From: Jeric@cup.portal.com
Received: from hobo.online.portal.com (hobo.online.portal.com [156.151.5.5]) by nova.unix.portal.com (8.6.11/8.6.5) with ESMTP id AAA02458 for <lightwave-l@netcom.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 1995 00:24:49 -0700
Received: (pccop@localhost) by hobo.online.portal.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) id AAA15207 for lightwave-l@netcom.com; Fri, 28 Apr 1995 00:24:48 -0700
To: lightwave-l@netcom.com
Subject: Re: HELLO (SMTP Id#: 21633) -Reply
Lines: 32
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 95 00:24:48 PDT
Message-ID: <9504280024.3.15131@cup.portal.com>
X-Origin: The Portal System (TM)
Sender: owner-lightwave-l@netcom.com
Precedence: bulk
Someone else wrote:
>Adrian Onsen wrote:
>
>> "...just create two scenes...when one is finished,
>> load up the other..."
>
>I think what he was referring to is camera position
>changes within a scene. (Shot changes, like in a film.)
>This can be easily done. Set a keyframe at the _last_ frame
>you want the camera at one point, manually advance to the
>next frame, position your camera, set it as a keyframe.
>The camera "snaps" from one position to the next, just like
>a "cut" in real life TV.
It used to be that with field rendering on, this would result
in an unsightly frame, as the camera did one field at one position
and the other in the second. I believe that Allen was considering
a fix-- did it get implemented?
If you aren't using field rendering, of course, this doesn't apply.